Horizon Telco Labs
SERVICES/CLOUD NATIVE & MICROSERVICES
KUBERNETES CONTAINER MESH
Cloud Native Architecture

Stop Redeploying Everything for One Small Change

We build telecom systems as independent, scalable microservices, or migrate an existing monolithic platform there, so a change to one part of the system does not put the whole thing at risk.

Book a Callarrow_forward
verifiedResilient deployment and rollback architecture
account_treeCloud-Native Microservices Architecture
ARCHITECTURE SKETCH
Cloud-native microservices architecture sketch showing API Gateway, independent microservices, event streaming, Kubernetes, databases and observability
A cloud-native structure separates API access, independent services, event-driven integration, Kubernetes deployment, data stores, and observability.
Monolithic Risk

The Problem

A lot of telecom software still runs as one large, tightly coupled application. A small fix to the billing logic can mean redeploying the entire platform, with all the testing and risk that comes with it. Scaling becomes all or nothing, instead of adding capacity only where it is actually needed.

Decomposition Practice

What We Do

schema

Microservices Architecture Design

Breaking a system into independently deployable services around real business boundaries, not arbitrary technical splits.

transform

Monolith to Microservices Migration

Moving an existing system over incrementally, while reducing migration risk and avoiding unnecessary large-scale replacement.

inventory

Containerization

Packaging services with Docker for consistent deployment across every environment.

cloud_sync

Kubernetes Orchestration

Managing deployment, scaling, and recovery of services in production with automated self-healing.

Foundation

How We Build It

Services are built in Java and Spring Boot, containerized with Docker, and run on Kubernetes, with CI/CD pipelines handling build, test, and deployment automatically.

This is the same architecture approach behind our billing and network API work. It is not a separate offering so much as the foundation everything else is built on.

Our Architecture Approach

What You Get

A system where teams can deploy their part independently, scale only what actually needs scaling, and roll back a bad change without taking the whole platform down with it.

Representative Engagements

Related Case Studies

All Case Studies arrow_forward
Middle East

Monolith to Microservices Migration for a Telecom Software Vendor

The vendor's OSS platform had grown into a single, tightly coupled application over several years. Every deployment carried real risk, and scaling meant scaling everything at once rather than only the components under load.

Result: Shorter release cycles and reduced deployment risk, with high-traffic components able to scale more independently.
Europe

Legacy OSS Modernization and Observability Upgrade

The operator's OSS environment was aging, difficult to modify safely, and offered limited visibility into system health. Issues were often discovered through customer complaints rather than internal monitoring.

Result: Broader observability coverage across operational services and faster incident identification and response.